Can the AI arms race be stopped?

[mklabgr]

Article behind paywall
Only summary provided

The Economist argues that the AI arms race is difficult to stop because the incentives facing governments and technology companies are strongly aligned toward continued investment. The US and China, in particular, see advanced AI as strategically important for economic growth, military capabilities and national security, while companies have enormous commercial incentives to build increasingly powerful systems. Even if governments agreed to limits, verification would be difficult and countries could fear that competitors might secretly continue developing more capable AI. The article therefore treats a simple global agreement to halt AI development as unrealistic.

Instead, the argument focuses on managing the race rather than expecting to end it. The Economist points toward measures such as international cooperation, greater transparency, safety standards and controls around the most powerful computing infrastructure. The central problem is that AI differs from traditional arms races: the technology is largely developed by private companies, spreads internationally, and can have both civilian and military applications. The challenge, therefore, is finding mechanisms that reduce the risks of uncontrolled competition without requiring countries to surrender the economic and strategic advantages they believe advanced AI can provide. 

ARTICLE